This game is nothing like the previous one. It is entirely on-rails. There is no freedom to explore, no side quests and no items. This is a miserable legacy that shames the series.

Ever since the release of Diablo, the action RPG genre has exploded. One of the early releases was Sacred on the PC. While it never gained the traction of the Diablo series, it sold enough copies to warrant a couple of sequels.

Less than ten hours; so you won't be suffering long; Graphically bright and varied environments; Responsive controls

Terrible dialogue and voice acting; Repetitive combat; Linear levels; Everything else

Its multriplayer fun in a repetitive button mashing 'gauntlet' sort of way. Opening graphics were great. In game graphics are functional. But audio? Was the in game 'adviser' narration done by a breathlessly excited american high school girl? And not in a good way.

Call the Gaming Police--we have a case of corpse desecration on our hands. Publisher Deep Silver has dug up Sacred, a deceased action RPG series with a small but devoted cult following, and allowed a new developer to play Dr. Frankenstein.

Easy to play with simple controls and seamless co-op; Cool visual effects and diverse locations make for a good-looking adventure

Frustratingly repetitive; Offensively bad writing and poor-quality voice acting; Balance issues cause frustration; especially for solo players

Dopo Sacred Citadel, spin-off non molto riuscito rilasciato l'anno passato, Deep Silver e Keen Games ci presentano il terzo capitolo ufficiale di una delle serie Hack ‘n' Slash più amate di sempre.

La versione PC si disinstalla in pochi click; La versione console ha buon mercato; potrete rivenderla

Di Sacred porta giusto il nome; Ripetitivo; noioso e privo di mordente; Prezzo assurdo; longevità inesistente

Sacred 3 ditches open-world exploration and instead opts for a more linear level structure. Unfortunately this change in design seeps into every facet of the game and the result drowns the proceedings in mediocrity.

"I love it." The specter of Diablo looms large over the action-RPG genre; most games borrow heavily from Blizzard's seminal game and those games' success is usually judged on how close they stick to the formula and how well they execute on that. "Oh baby.

Sacred est un hack'n slash qui a vu le jour de façon exclusive sur PC il y a dix ans. Le second volet de la série, sorti en 2009 sur plusieurs plateformes, proposait une bonne alternative à des ténors tels que Diablo, assurant une certaine liberté d'action et, surtout, la possibilité de jouer en...

Graphiquement réussi; Défoulant en solo et en multijoueurs

Très linéaire; Aucune réelle liberté d'action; Répétitif dans sa structure; Humour horripilant; Beaucoup de lag en ligne

Sacred is nothing.

Disclaimer: I'm not much of a gamer, and I did not play Sacred or Sacred 2, so I lack games to compare this to. That being said I have enjoyed playing Sacred 3. I've primarily played it as a multi-player game with my husband (and online players).