Electronic Arts nous ressert son FPS de prédilection, Medal of Honor. Se présentant sans autre attribut que son simple nom, le titre de DICE et EA est une invitation à retrouver l'ambiance propre à la franchise. C'est du moins ce que l'on croyait bien avant le lancement du jeu.

Nouveau contexte; Nouveaux décors; Très simple à prendre en main pour un public débutant; La présence d'un mode multijoueur

Une campagne solo courte; L'IA des alliés très faible; Des graphismes d'une autre époque; Trop de scripts; Manque cruel de rythme

Today, as you read this, real U.S. forces - alongside allied nations and native Afghans - are fighting a brutal war against motivated insurgents in hostile territory. Today, in the new Medal of Honor, you can play the game based on that conflict.

+ Expert blend of "big" events and tight missions remains diverse enough to keep you playing; + Multiplayer modes are compelling as any of the three available classes

- Some mission glitches; ? When are they coming home

While Medal of Honor has garnered a fair amount of pre-release controversy in the mainstream press, it would be a stretch to label the game controversial (at least after they took out the ability to play as the Taliban), unless you firmly believe in the infallibility of government and intelligence...

Engaging storyline and characters; Lighting and environmental effects make for great settings; Multiplayer plays to the squad element of the game very well

Single-player campaign is very short; Some minor technical glitches in the campaign; Shooter veterans may experience some deja vu

A successful first-person shooter must cover three things at the very least. First, solid gameplay basics to give the game a strong core. Second, some originality to set it apart from the other first-person shooters out there, since comparisons will obviously be made.

Falling just short of expectations. There are some games that come out that simply crack […]

+ Fun multiplayer; + Solid moment-to-moment Gunplay

Uninteresting story; Tons of technical issues; Cannot find a balance between realism and an action movie

It's been roughly three years since we last saw any addition to the Medal of Honor series. Well known for their World War II perspectives, the develop

Great single-player experience; Subtle touches at realism; Very fun & refined combat

Poorly executed multiplayer experience; Plentiful frame rate issues

Major game publishers still seem unwilling to fully tackle the events, interpretations, and consequences of America's most recent set of military conflicts, but while EA bowed to mounting pressure and removed the word "Taliban" from Medal of Honor 's multiplayer suite, the terminology remains an...

you're looking for a new multiplayer experience

you were looking to play a single player campaign for longer than five hours

Though it may be tempting to look at its flaws and dismiss Medal of Honor as inferior to its competitors, there is a lot to enjoy here. The campaign has its shortcomings, but its unique sense of scope and well-orchestrated pacing make it an enjoyably cohesive adventure.

Well-paced campaign; Immersive dialogue; Taut multiplayer action

Heavy-handed campaign scripting; Enemy AI isn't terribly realistic; Some incongruous cutscenes; Steep multiplayer learning curve

EA never seemed to recover back when the guys at 2015 Studios closed up shop and quit to create Infinity Ward and the Call of Duty franchise. These guys had been working on successful Medal of Honor games, but they left due to EA trying to crush them in the iron grip of creative control, all for a...

It seems that the developers of " Medal of Honor " have created a game which cannot decide whether it has been made as a single player or multiplayer game and as a result the whole package suffers slightly.