But for those who like something in between - a game with a bit more to it than the average beer & pretzel fare, but still quick to both learn and understand; something that the average person would like to sit down and play, that also offers enough detail to keep the interest of a more hardcore...

Easy to learn; decent map graphics

Gameplay may not be deep enough for hardcore wargamers

Very good game, multiplayer is still alive and very active. 7 patches that must be individually installed and take up 3.5gb all together but its worth it

I find it is most fun on CTF, team deathmatch and War. My personal favourite of these maps is revolution. It's built for game modes such as Search and Destroy, War, Domination and Team Deathmatch.

DELETED DELETED DELETED DELETED DELETED DELETED DELETED DELETED DELETED DELETED DELETED DELETED DELETED DELETED DELETED DELETED DELETED DELETED DELETED DELETED DELETED DELETED DELETED DELETED DELETED DELETED DELETED DELETED DELETED DELETED DELETED DELETED DELETED DELETED DELETED DELETED DELETED...

Old - school gameplay

Slow

Awesome on the beta, fast paced action with amazing graphics and sounds. Why do people feel the need to slate games? Comparing them to their previous titles? I don't recall cod 4 being set in ww2 fighting in the pacific against the japanese. See? They're totally different games.

When all is said and done, is this game worth the $60? To me, no it's not. CoD: WaW has too much in common with CoD4 and it returned to a tired genre. The WWII shooter is played out and it's time for developers to stop using it like a crutch.

So let's play fit-as-many-cliches-as-you-can. Our target is Call of Duty Fi... I mean, Call of Duty: World at War. Your time starts... now!

World at War is the definitive collection of historical turn based warfare: it's how the genre should be done. Sporting monstrous features coupled with straightforward yet multifarious gameplay, World at War successfully delivers the goods.