Good sharp pics and 4k video is a nice bonus. 35x optical zoom ia fast and anti vibration good too

Easy to use ,good features,and value for money

None I have found

Using the zoom lens at full stretch means it is difficult to stop "shake"; Obviously a tripod is needed; The video switch is in a most stupid place to use easily and stop recording; Its position needs revising pdq

This was my 30th digital camera since 2000 and my third Nikon, the first two being the D5000 and D5200 which took great photos but had lousy video. After eight years with a Sony HX9 pocket camera, I had high hopes for the A900 as its successor.

For the amateur photographer this camera is great. If you have a good eye for a photo but not a great deal of technical expertise, this camera is for you. The low light exposure does all the work for you without the flash. The 35x zoom works great with good clarity.

In the world of compact cameras, manufacturers have to work hard to tempt you away from the ever-present smartphone. One way this is still possible is the optical zoom -- and if you're travelling or looking for flexibility, the bigger the better.

Long zoom; Pocket-friendly; Tilting screen and SnapBridge

Screen isn't touch-sensitive; small sensor and there's no viewfinder; Low-light performance could be better

The Nikon Coolpix A900 is a new superzoom compact camera which offers a 35x optical zoom, or an equivalent to 24-480mm in 35mm terms. Inside the camera is a 1/2.3-inch type CMOS sensor with 20.3 million pixels.

This camera is good, it's affordable and it takes really good photos. For example, the zoom is able to get some really good photos of the moon and you can edit your photos. The only downside is that sometimes the camera stuffs up.

I just bought this camera, image quality was good. SnapBridge software was miserable. This software can only transfer 2 megapixels image to your device. The transferred image was blurred.

If you're disappointed by the price point of the Nikon Coolpix A900, it's understandable. After all, a camera with a 1/2.3-inch sized image sensor and inconsistent overall image quality perhaps shouldn't have a starting price point near $400.