I love the X-H1! I realize that it may not be viewed as perfect by some people with regards to an issue such as it's size but in my view, it is very close to perfect. I am comparing this to the X-T2 below and not other brands of cameras so I am not including details of the Fuji line of cameras such...

Until now, the Fujifilm X-series has boasted two flagship models, the hybrid rangefinder X-Pro 2 and the DSLR-styled X-T2 . Now, however, they find themselves playing second fiddle to the X-H1 which takes its rightful place at the top of the range.

Good handling; Practical controls; Top-level performance

Large and heavy body; Not the best autofocus

Aimed at advanced and enthusiast photographers, the Fujifilm X-H1 ($1899, body only) has a 24MP APS-C sensor with 5-axis (5.5EV) image stabilization. We take a closer look at this mirrorless camera in this review.

The Fujifilm X-H1 is the most capable model in the mirrorless X-series to date, taking the core control, speed and quality of the popular X-T2 and upgrading it with a tougher shell, deeper grip, touchscreen, improved movie features, a more detailed viewfinder, Bluetooth connectivity and most...

FUJIFILM X RAW STUDIO enables photographers to quickly and easily convert RAW files with outstanding image quality, once a camera is connected to a Mac or PC via USB cable. Exceptional image quality is retained, as the FUJIFILM X RAW STUDIO system utilizes the X-Processor Pro in the camera instead...

The Fujifilm X-H1 is a great camera for shooting videos thanks to its variety of resolutions, frame rates, bit rates, film simulations, and aspect ratios, not to mention 5-axis IBIS and features like F-Log.

Intended and designed for videographers and filmmakers, the X-H1 can shoot 4K video and offers a number of shooting modes, aspect ratios, and slow motion options; It also has the 5-axis in-body image stabilization (IBIS), the cinematic Eterna film simulation, and an F-Log Gamma option for wider...

One of the biggest letdowns we found in the X-H1 is its autofocus; It's not that it's bad, but for the price, we expected more; In fact, shooting a moving subject at AF-C almost always yields more than a couple of unfocused shots.