I have played the Diablo 3 beta and I can assure that the game is absolutly fantastic! Even if people say it was worth an 8 or 9 i belive it is worth a complete 10 out of 10 (or 5 out of 5) for jbhifi! Absoultly brilliant game and well worth buying and playing over and over again!

Wandering around gloomy dungeons attacking endless waves of enemies should be the most tedious thing in the world, but in Diablo 3, it's quite the opposite. Blizzard, with their years of MMO experience, know exactly how to appeal to the obsessive compulsive gamer.

Addictive loot system; Satisfying combat; Big; challenging dungeons

Server troubles affect single-player; Slow first few hours

The moment I booted up Diablo III on my computer I could tell two things: It was another polished game by Blizzard Entertainment, and I had a new addiction on my hands. After spending over 30 hours slaying demonic beasts, gearing up my heroes, and clearing dungeons with friends, I can safely say...

Five classes; all worth playing; ...because the combat is so good; Quality of cut-scenes is heavenly; Lots of loot for your collection; Plenty of challenge to keep you engaged

Lots of loot for your collection; Tags

You've been patient and waited for this game to come out in the four years since it was announced. Was it worth it? Is it a worthy successor to the Diablo franchise? Will your mouse love you or hate you? Find out in this review.

Gorgeous graphics; Loot whores: this is your brand-new bag; Lots of variety in gameplay

What's with that abrupt ending; Limited follower outfitting; Where's the PvP; My mouse finger hurts

The Lord of Terror is back! I am a Diablo fan. I own Diablo on Playstation, playing co-op with friends when I can, and I still frequent Diablo II because of the deep game play and dark story line.

Great; addictive game play; More Diablo

Always on DRM; Sound should be better

the second it went live, Blizzard's dungeon crawler is one of the most-anticipated PC releases in recent memory. For a sequel with so much riding on it, the title didn't get off to the best start.

It says a lot that Blizzard are sticking by their "always-online" Diablo III decision. When the game released last week (May 15 for the stragglers out there), the frustration and community outcry that followed from the global introduction to "Error 37" can not be understated.

Diablo II came out 12 years ago, and it's been going strong since then. The simple, addictive dungeon crawler captured the hearts of gamers with its massive expansion from the first Diablo and broad variety of locations, enemies, and loot.

Simple, addictive gameplay; Streamlined multiplayer experience

Requires you to be always online even when playing single-player; Modest graphics

Diablo III is possibly the most and least ambitious game to have released in recent years. Following up the beloved, glorious and seminal dungeon crawler Diablo II was always going to be a tall order, and as the years marched on, our expectations swelled to potentially insurmountable levels.

Brilliantly balanced and unique classes; versatile new skill system; Stupendously polished combat and dungeon crawling; Infinitely enjoyable multiplayer

Horrendous launch and always online issues; lack of offline singleplayer, Some levels and dungeons are short and linear (not to mention the final act, One man's 'streamlining' is another man's 'dumbing down

The amazing thing is that no matter how much I've played Diablo 3 on the PC (and it was a lot, believe me), it was just tremendously entertaining on the Xbox 360, even though I knew what to expect around every corner. Same enemies, same environment, same bloody story.

Smooth and almost flawless gameplay that's still hellishly addictive (almost diabolically; in fact); a game you'll enjoy from start to finish and you'll probably start playing it again once you're done; plenty of class-specific loot awaits this time around

It's been a long time since the PC version and still no fresh content, they could've at least put a new class in; interface issues in local co-op