Good standard Call of Duty game. First in the series of CoD games to have Natzi zombie (side game) maps.

The single player is definately better than Call of Duty 4(and that's a fact). IMO, Treyarch made COD4's engine look way better in this game. They added more detail in everything like the water and soldiers. Multi player is the same. I like the seven kill streak and getting the dogs.

This isn't a bad game, but I'm really glad I played the excellent CoD4 Modern Warfare and the outstanding Modern Warfare 2 first, because this one is "OK" at best. I honestly don't think I would have bothered buying Modern Warfare 1+2 games (which turned out to my favorite shooters in years) based...

Great graphics and solid game mechanics; WWII makes for a compelling shooter setting; The creative direction is first-rate, the environments really looks and feel like the places they're supposed to represent

Throwaway narrative full of boderline-stupid Hollywood stereotype characters (this almost gets comical at times) and disjointed missions; First-person gameplay is extremely tedious on the harder settings

Is this the best Call of Duty game? I don't think so, Call of Duty 4 holds that title in my opinion. With that said, I think it ranks a strong number two. If the storyline had been a bit more cohesive then it would have been perfect.

Modern War was a difficult title to follow up. Therefore in that sense World at War is a little lacking to one of the best first person shooters, at least in my opinion. That is why I do not truly see this as a follow up, especially since Modern War 2 is the true follow up to CoD 4.

I have played many COD games and i must tell you this is a bit mature than your other COD games you can't just go in guns blazing you will get killed. For completing each objective there are 2 ways and that is in every mission.