series before, so when this little bundle showed up on my doorstep I was excited but also a little concerned. I was excited to finally give this series a whirl on one of the most powerful consoles ever but I was concerned for two reasons.

Is this the best Call of Duty game? I don't think so, Call of Duty 4 holds that title in my opinion. With that said, I think it ranks a strong number two. If the storyline had been a bit more cohesive then it would have been perfect.

If you've played Call of Duty games before then the control scheme will be instantly familiar and the weapons from past titles, such as the M1 Garand and the Browning Automatic Rifle make a predicable, but welcome, return.

Cinematic visuals and soundtrack; Great A.I makes it a rewarding challenge; Brilliant co-op and multiplayer modes

Extremely tough in places

Call of Duty: World at War is a lot like its predecessor, Call of Duty 4: Modern Warfare. In most respects, this is a good thing. The guns are tightly tuned, the tone is gritty and mature, and the action is exciting and fast-paced.

Gritty; exciting story; Same excellent multiplayer system; Four-player cooperative campaign; Bayonets and flamethrowers; Nazi Zombies

Familiar setting; Familiar game mechanics; Familiar guns

Throughout the history of the Call of Duty games, developer Infinity Ward has created each major version of the game and then handed things off to Treyarch to handle the expansions and minor sequels.

In conclusion, if you're looking for a new single player title and have never played MGS, there's nothing in the market that is worth buying more than this. Regardless of whether this is the first time you're playing through the game or the hundredth, MGS HD Collection proves to be an emotional...

were sky high to say the least. This game isn't being developed by Infinity Ward though, with development being handled by Treyarch, developers of

Call of Duty: World at War , surprisingly, lives up to its predecessor. It loses a few points for lack of originality and while it doesn't have the same freshness that Call of Duty 4 had, it's ability to throw gamers into WWII battles that haven't yet been realised in a game is encouraging.

Modern War was a difficult title to follow up. Therefore in that sense World at War is a little lacking to one of the best first person shooters, at least in my opinion. That is why I do not truly see this as a follow up, especially since Modern War 2 is the true follow up to CoD 4.

Yes this game is fun but it is not suitable for children! Hence the MATURE rating and the INTENSE VIOLENCE, and STRONG LANGUAGE warnings on the back. Don't listen to that other idiots review.

Challenging; Easy to learn; Fun To Play; Good Audio; Graphics; Multiplayer

Too Short; Too Violent