When the original D7000 was launched roughly four and a half years ago, Nikon significantly raised the bar of what we could expect from a camera of its class. Features like 100% viewfinder coverage, 6fps shooting, 2016 pixel metering and twin memory card slots were a big deal in 2010, but it's...

Let me start by saying I have owned and sold The Nikon D7100,Pentax K3, I was wondering if the The Nikon D7200 would be much better than the 7100 which is a great camera itself The D7200 is wonderful, The photos are punchy and sharp Great low light performance,very good noise control the menu is...

I take wildlife pictures and this camera delivers.

This is my 3rd Nikon D7200. I have had the D80, D90 before the D7200's, but the 7200 is by far the most amazing camera yet. I also have the D750, that is really great for wide angle shots. I use the D7200 for about everything including astrophotography, and macro work.

This a good camera of photography good and smooth work in photoshoot The D7200 can now extend its ISO higher than on its predecessor, but with a catch. Seeing how little color detail would be left at ISO 51, 200 and 102, 400, Nikon has chosen to make those two sensitivities black and white only.

The D7200 is presently Nikon's flagship DSLR camera with APS-C sensor, and it shows. It has improved over its predecessors, and delivers in grounds where it needs to. The weight of the camera induces confidence in using it, and gives it a professional bearing, along with a body with a full set of...

Better low light focussing; Excellent ISO performance; Good colour accuracy; Improved low light performance; Use of pentaprism viewfinder makes a lot of difference; Much improved buffer size allows higher continuous RAW shooting

Bulky dimensions; No tiltable/touchscreen viewfinder; Image processing takes a little more time than ideal

The Nikon D7200 makes the 2-year-old D7100 look like a terrific deal. With only minor improvements over its predecessor, the D7200 remains a great camera, but given the D7100's lower price, the D7200 is a tough sell unless you're a night owl or long burst shooter. Once the D7100 evaporates from the market -- or the price stops dropping and starts rising -- then the D7200 will seem more compelling. It's the same pattern the D7100 faced over the D7000 before it.

The Nikon D7200 is a great camera for the money, as long as you don't care about an extensive feature set.

Great photo quality; solid performance and a sturdy body are the Nikon D7200's highlights.

Subpar wireless implementation and a fixed LCD display.

Nikon introduced the successor of D7200 in a similar looking body, like most upgrades in the FX series. But it improved upon the very thing the D7000 and the D7100 were known for – speed.

High shutter speed; Highest res display

Bulky and pricey for crop frame

The Nikon D7200 makes the 2-year-old D7100 look like a terrific deal. With only minor improvements over its predecessor, the D7200 remains a great camera, but given the D7100's lower price, the D7200 is a tough sell unless you're a night owl or long burst shooter.

Great photo quality; solid performance and a sturdy body are the Nikon D7200's highlights

Subpar wireless implementation and a fixed LCD display

My previous camera was the Nikon D7000. The D7200 is a much better camera overall. Faster to acquire moving subjects (mostly birds). Locks on focus better. Is definitely sharper. Better low light capabilities. My capture rate has gone up and the photos I am producing now are sharper and clearer.

Very fast and sharp focus