TP-Link TL-WDR3600
Reviews
Show product page
13 years ago
Efficient, but not stable - manufacture fault
Had purchased this product to connect to Distributel modem - Huawei. Was easy to install, maintained the speed at 72 Mbps, but... continuosly was losing connection overnight.
13 years ago
Bought this router as a replacement for my old Cisco wrt160n. The initial setup of this router is quite simple, just follow the "quick setup" at the router's web interface and you should be done within 5 minutes. The range is definitely better than my old router.
Pros:
- -Cheap
- -Working great at 5.0Ghz
- -Reasonable long range
Cons:
- -Useless 2.4Ghz
- -Takes about an minute to reset when saving router configuration
13 years ago
TP-Link TL-WDR3600 drops internet connection every 2 - 5 minutes
With both modems, the TP-Link TL-WDR3600 dropped the internet connection every 2 - 5 minutes. The only remedy was to reset the internet connection every two minutes. This is totally unacceptable.
Pros:
- The TP-Link TL-WDR3600 is advertised as being dual-dand, with two USB ports
- That's about the only comment I can objectively make about this router that is positive
Cons:
- I bought a TP-Link TL-WDR3600 router brand new, with stock firmware version TL-WDR3600_V1_120508 (Firmware Date: 5/28/2012) pre-installed
- I tried to use the TL-WDR3600 router with two different modems, a Motorola SB5100, and a Motorola SB6141 that previously worked flawlessly with a LinkSys WRT54GS...
10 years ago
OK for the price
Poor radio performance compared to my older TP-Link router, but this one has 5GHz as well, which is what I really wanted. Somewhat clunky web interface, but it works.
13 years ago
TP-Link is known for providing a lot of bang for your buck, and it was definitely true for the TL-WR2543ND. When we reviewed this 450Mbps router earlier this year it earned the Bronze Award.
13 years ago
TP-Link TL-WDR3600 router review
It's well priced: the similar WDR4300 (a so-called N750 router for its ability to achieve 450Mbps on 5GHz) is identical except that it costs £20 more and has three, rather than two detachable antennae.
4.0
from 26 reviews
5
58.0%
4
16.0%
3
4.0%
2
8.0%
1
12.0%
