Not much really

A bit of a nuisance to keep putting in on - and then you have to focus manually; which resulted quite often in poor quality photos

As expected

While it's a shame that picture and sound quality haven't been upgraded, the iPhone 13 was great in these regards and the iPhone 14 is, too Excellent display Admirable headphone performance Solid build quality No upgrades to picture or sound Familiar design Notch is still present

Apple's latest non-Pro iPhone is superb - it's just that it's strikingly similar to last year's effort.

Still an incredible smartphone, Brilliant battery life gets a bit better, Excellent camera system gets a bit better

Last year’s Pro hardware, Wireless charging slow by modern standards, No USB-C; it’s now well overdue

When I first tested this against the Mk2 extender for IQ with static indoor test subjects, I thought I had made a mistake in spending so much in that the differences in IQ other than in the mid / corners did not seem that different.

Cost effective solution as works superbly with my 70-200 2.8 Mk11; much better contrast / saturation and tighter fit than Mk11 version

Images are slightly degraded and will always be compared to equivalent length alternative lenses

Tested on 5D MkII and 70-200 Mk II Do your research, you are going to lose autofocus speed, a little bit of image quality (depending on what you pair it with). Saying that I was comfortable with the images coming out, I had the benefit of not having to shell out for a 300mm or 100-400mm and carry...

More like an iPhone 13S. The generational upgrades for the iPhone 14 are limited to a few subtle changes. At the same time, however, the base price climbs to 800 USD, while the only true innovation happens inside the iPhone 14 Pro series.

excellent OLED display, dust- and waterproof, fast Wi-Fi, wide range of supported frequencies, great camera, very fast performance, good battery life

display limited to 60 Hz, charging rate limited to 20 watts, no macro lens, wide notch

Very good to keep in the bag and great for turning a 300 f2.8 into a 600 f5.6 but with limitations. If you don't need to crop then its fine. If Canon made a 1.7x I would have bought that, knowing how good the 1.4x is. Overall pretty good but if you want long lens quality, buy the ￡￡￡￡￡ lenses.

Durable; Lightweight

Looses Some Image Quality

"If you are putting this on a high quality lens then it is a good way to get a lot of extra telephoto reach without taking up much room in your camera bag. Images when used with a great lens such as the Canon 70-200f2.8L IS II are very good and certainly a lot easier then carrying a 400mm lens as...

I really enjoy shooting with this attached to my f2.8 80-200 lens. The only sadness is that it is limited to f 5.6. This is not a problem in the sun or other bright circumstances but is a problem with low light - especially when hand holding the shot